lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs
    On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, David S. Miller wrote:
    > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200
    > Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
    >
    > > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because
    > > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold
    > > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure
    > > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff.
    >
    > Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It
    > accomplishes both of our goals.

    Please do so! And not only for syscalls, but also for other things.

    That way we can procmail all mails sent to lkml or bk-commits-head that
    add #warnings to arch/<arch>/ or include/asm-<arch>/.

    Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

    Geert

    --
    Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

    In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
    -- Linus Torvalds
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.026 / U:61.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site