[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs
    On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, David S. Miller wrote:
    > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200
    > Andi Kleen <> wrote:
    > > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because
    > > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold
    > > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure
    > > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff.
    > Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It
    > accomplishes both of our goals.

    Please do so! And not only for syscalls, but also for other things.

    That way we can procmail all mails sent to lkml or bk-commits-head that
    add #warnings to arch/<arch>/ or include/asm-<arch>/.



    Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

    In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
    -- Linus Torvalds
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.018 / U:1.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site