lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8
From
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Hey, let's stop this here.
>
> You are both (in)correct :)
>
> 1. It makes no sense to discuss, why X has been considered correct for
> time T.
>
> 2. Counted semaphores are a valid use and should be marked explicit as
> counted semaphores.
>
> 3. Using mutexes and semaphores for event and completion signalling
> should be converted to the appropriate interfaces.
>
> A bunch of work, but not really hard.

What's the verdict ? leave the lock detector alone or change it ?

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.787 / U:28.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site