| Date | Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:06:29 -0700 | Subject | Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8 | From | Bill Huey (hui) <> |
| |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Hey, let's stop this here. > > You are both (in)correct :) > > 1. It makes no sense to discuss, why X has been considered correct for > time T. > > 2. Counted semaphores are a valid use and should be marked explicit as > counted semaphores. > > 3. Using mutexes and semaphores for event and completion signalling > should be converted to the appropriate interfaces. > > A bunch of work, but not really hard.
What's the verdict ? leave the lock detector alone or change it ?
bill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|