lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8
    From
    On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    > Hey, let's stop this here.
    >
    > You are both (in)correct :)
    >
    > 1. It makes no sense to discuss, why X has been considered correct for
    > time T.
    >
    > 2. Counted semaphores are a valid use and should be marked explicit as
    > counted semaphores.
    >
    > 3. Using mutexes and semaphores for event and completion signalling
    > should be converted to the appropriate interfaces.
    >
    > A bunch of work, but not really hard.

    What's the verdict ? leave the lock detector alone or change it ?

    bill

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:4.060 / U:0.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site