[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Hey, let's stop this here.
> You are both (in)correct :)
> 1. It makes no sense to discuss, why X has been considered correct for
> time T.
> 2. Counted semaphores are a valid use and should be marked explicit as
> counted semaphores.
> 3. Using mutexes and semaphores for event and completion signalling
> should be converted to the appropriate interfaces.
> A bunch of work, but not really hard.

What's the verdict ? leave the lock detector alone or change it ?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.532 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site