[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U9
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 20:57, K.R. Foley wrote:
>>>I guess, you don't have a tulip network card in your box, as the module
>>>is removed.
>>>The question is, if it got registered correctly before the removal.
>>Actually I do have the tulip card in the box and I am pulling this stuff
>>from the logs over that connection now. Here are the next lines from the
>>log that might help.
> Not really. We must figure out, why sys_delete_module is called.

Understand. I did not mean the log would help figure it out, but that it
would explain that the card really is present. :)

My guess is that it is prematurely unloading the driver before it's
fully registered, like you said. The question is why? Also I am not in
front of the system right now so I can't unload the module to see if it
generates the error again, but I will try it when I get home.

> [<e09a7767>] tulip_cleanup+0x17/0x1b [tulip] (16)
> [<c0139801>] sys_delete_module+0x121/0x150 (12) <<--------
> [<c01531a1>] sys_munmap+0x51/0x60 (64)
> [<c0116a20>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x660 (16)
> [<c0106719>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 (16)
>>Oct 21 12:33:22 porky kernel: tulip 0000:04:0a.0: Device was removed
>>without pro
>>perly calling pci_disable_device(). This may need fixing.
> This one is a result of the BUG()
> tglx

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.571 / U:5.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site