[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Structural changes for Documentation directory
    Dave Jones <> wrote:
    > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:00:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > > The other possibility is to have a TODO file with a list of out-of-date
    > > > files, and have the removal of the file listing in the TODO file be part
    > > > of the patch submission.
    > >
    > > It all sounds too complex. ./docs/ is fine.
    > asides from bloating up interdiffs, what does moving stuff around
    > gain us over just fixing stuff in place ? Do we really have
    > that much out of date documentation to justify this ?

    Well I was thinking of it as a simple way of tracking what has and hasn't
    been done. But yeah, that could just as easily be tracked via a new
    checklist file.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.026 / U:0.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site