[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Structural changes for Documentation directory
Dave Jones <> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:00:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > The other possibility is to have a TODO file with a list of out-of-date
> > > files, and have the removal of the file listing in the TODO file be part
> > > of the patch submission.
> >
> > It all sounds too complex. ./docs/ is fine.
> asides from bloating up interdiffs, what does moving stuff around
> gain us over just fixing stuff in place ? Do we really have
> that much out of date documentation to justify this ?

Well I was thinking of it as a simple way of tracking what has and hasn't
been done. But yeah, that could just as easily be tracked via a new
checklist file.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.060 / U:3.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site