Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:07:00 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Structural changes for Documentation directory |
| |
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:00:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > The other possibility is to have a TODO file with a list of out-of-date > > > files, and have the removal of the file listing in the TODO file be part > > > of the patch submission. > > > > It all sounds too complex. ./docs/ is fine. > > asides from bloating up interdiffs, what does moving stuff around > gain us over just fixing stuff in place ? Do we really have > that much out of date documentation to justify this ? >
Well I was thinking of it as a simple way of tracking what has and hasn't been done. But yeah, that could just as easily be tracked via a new checklist file.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |