[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] add hook to generic irq code (free_irq)
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 07:31:56PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> This is needed because some architectures (well, presently only UML)
> needs to be notified as things are freed.
> Signed-off-by:
> I can't say I'm 100% happy about this, either the name or a somewhat
> ugly hook that is called with a spinlock held but for lack of any
> better suggestions...

This looks rather bogus to me. What prevents UML from doing it's work
at the struct hw_interrupt_type level?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.100 / U:4.988 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site