[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] add hook to generic irq code (free_irq)
    On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 07:31:56PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
    > This is needed because some architectures (well, presently only UML)
    > needs to be notified as things are freed.
    > Signed-off-by:
    > I can't say I'm 100% happy about this, either the name or a somewhat
    > ugly hook that is called with a spinlock held but for lack of any
    > better suggestions...

    This looks rather bogus to me. What prevents UML from doing it's work
    at the struct hw_interrupt_type level?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.020 / U:15.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site