[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U5
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:04, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > All sleep_on variants trigger the irqs_disabled() check in schedule().
> > tglx
> ah, forgot that the waitqueue lock is a raw lock. Is there _any_
> scenario where sleep_on() is actually correct kernel code?

Hmm, the sleep_on() variants are used quite a lot over the kernel. Whats
wrong with them and to what should they be converted ?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.659 / U:1.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site