Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:30:25 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: per-process shared information |
| |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > that you can't get those values efficiently. Even assuming you're ok to > drop shared by disabling SHR, it wouldn't help, without a kernel API > change.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 01:51:56PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: >> Well, as long as it makes the users happy... I don't personally >> care, except to say that I don't care to document all sorts >> of kernel-specific variations. It gets hopelessly messy.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yep, I believe users could be happy with Hugh's rss-anon_rss variant.
I just checked in with some Oracle people and the primary concern is splitting up RSS into shared and private. Given either shared or private the other is calculable.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |