[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fw: signed kernel modules?
On Mer, 2004-10-13 at 23:40, Rusty Russell (IBM) wrote:
> > Whoops bang "num 0 elements". That check set isn't safe standalone
> Thanks, Alan.
> I'd appreciate your opinion on the issue at hand. Is it worth 600 lines
> of ELF verification and canonicalization code so we can strip modules
> without altering the signature?

I'm unconvinced at the moment, it seems it would be easier to write the
neccessary code to do this in userspace, and then sign the canonicalised
module so that the kernel interface is small and clean.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.078 / U:4.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site