[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fw: signed kernel modules?
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 23:03 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Nice how you conclude from your habits to habits of other people,

I'm one of the people who I suspect is _most_ likely to compile their
own kernel, and yet _still_ the majority of my boxen are running distro
kernels. It seemed like a relevant enough observation to me, in response
to your bizarre claim that 'most people compile kernel and modules on
the same machine'.

> but why did you ignore the rest of my mail? The primary topic of this
> was module signing not compile habits.

Because it didn't seem relevant. You joined a thread about module
signing asking "how to you want to win the whole game?" and saying "I'm
missing how this does fit into the big picture". Since I was only
discussing the technical details of _how_ we sign modules, I wasn't
really interested in such questions.

If you _really_ need an answer then yes, I accept that module signing
won't achieve world peace all by itself. There, are you happy now? :)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.068 / U:12.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site