[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:28:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <> wrote:
> > When I was reviewing this it seemed like it would be possible to keep
> > RCU anonymous by moving the callback processing out of the tasklet .
> > The reason it was moved into a tasklet was to reduce latency. But if
> > you serialize it like you have, aren't you removing all the benefits
> > of the RCU type lock in those section that are converted to the new
> > API ?
> only if compiling for PREEMPT_REALTIME. Given the overhead of
> PREEMPT_REALTIME i'm not sure RCU matters that much. But the nicest
> would be Dipankar's preemptible-RCU patch.

I am swamped this week and racing against time to get some other
pending things done in time. I will look at the issue of RCU with
PREEMPT_REALTIME next week and try to help out.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.513 / U:2.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site