[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel

* Dipankar Sarma <> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 07:50:29AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > regarding RCU serialization - i think that is the way to go - i dont
> > think there is any sensible way to extend RCU to a fully preempted
> > model, RCU is all about per-CPU-ness and per-CPU-ness is quite limited
> > in a fully preemptible model.
> It seems that way to me too. Long ago I implemented preemptible RCU,
> but did not follow it through because I believed it was not a good
> idea. The original patch is here :


> This allows read-side critical sections of RCU to be preempted. It
> will take a bit of work to re-use it in RCU as of now, but I don't
> think it makes sense to do so. [...]

note that meanwhile i have implemented another variant:

i dont think this will be the final interface (the _rt postfix is
stupid, it should probably be _spin?), but i think this is roughly the
structure of how to attack it - a minimal extension to the RCU APIs to
allow for serialization. What do you think about this particular

> [...] My primary concern is DoS/OOM situation due to preempted tasks
> holding up RCU.

in the serialization solution in -U0 it would be possible to immediately
free the RCU entries and hence have no DoS/OOM situation - although the
-U0 patch does not do this yet.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.079 / U:6.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site