[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Submitting patches for unmaintained areas (Solaris x86 UFS bug)
    On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:10:10PM +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote:
    > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:06:29 +0100, Alex Kiernan <> wrote:
    > > I've run into a bug in the UFS reading code (on Solaris x86 the
    > > major/minor numbers are in 2nd indirect offset not the first), so I've
    > > patched it & bugzilled it
    > > (
    > >
    > > But where do I go from here? There doesn't seem to be a maintainer for
    > > UFS so I can't send it there.
    > >
    > After advice from Alan (thanks), here's the patch which addresses the
    > problem I'm seeing. Specifically it appears that on x86 Solaris stores
    > the major/minor device numbers in the 2nd indirect block, not the
    > first.

    1) please, move old_encode_dev()/old_decode_dev() into your helper functions.
    2) we could do a bit better now that we have large dev_t. What are complete
    rules for
    a) Solaris userland dev_t => on-disk data
    b) major/minor => Solaris userland dev_t
    on sparc and x86 Solaris?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.020 / U:8.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site