[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Linux-cachefs] Re: [PATCH] NFS using CacheFS

Trond Myklebust <> wrote:
> That said, David & co.: why did you choose not to use something similar
> to the Solaris syntax for cachefs?


(1) when I wrote cachefs I didn't know that Solaris had such a thing

(2) I don't know what Solaris syntax is - I've seen one example, and that
didn't make a lot of sense

(3) my way doesn't involve any changes to userspace programs such as mount

> The "layered filesystem" syntax has the advantage that it would avoid
> entirely the need to change the NFS mount syntax,

And the disadvantage that we'd have to change the VFS to support it, I
think. I don't know how this "layered filesystem" thing operates or is used,
so I'm guessing.

> and would make it easier to port cachefs to cifs etc.

I doubt it. The netfs still has to interact with fscache internally to decide
how match netfs files to cache files, which is what most of the interface is
about; and to push/pull pages to/from the cache (this bit could possibly be
made transparent, but I'm not sure how you'd do it on Linux with the present
VM & VFS interfaces).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.050 / U:26.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site