[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Announcing Binary Compatibility/Testing
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 18:39 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Userland ABI compatibility has always been a strongly held value in
> Linux, I don't think we would flame any efforts to support that...

Yah. With the exception of maybe changing something in /proc (which has
been rare, and hopefully will never happen with /sys) the kernel-to-user
ABI is really stable.

I'd venture, in fact, to say that this effort is very important but does
not affect the kernel at all. Current "fault" lies in things e.g. like
the C++ ABI, which is constantly fluctuating (rightly so, to fix bugs,
but still).

Any other incompatibility lies in libraries, but we have library
versioning. There is nothing wrong with newer libs breaking
compatibility so long as they have a different soname. Vendors just
need to ship compat libs and ISV's need to make sure they request the
right lib and don't touch internals.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.093 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site