lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [OOPS] 2.6.9-rc4, dual Opteron, NUMA, 8GB
    On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:49:08PM -0700, Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
    > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    >
    > > Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
    > > > I was just about to mail and report that disabling NUMA does help:
    > > >
    > > > NUMA + mke2fs on LVM: OOPS (mailed earlier)
    > > > no NUMA + mke2fs on LVM: okay
    > > > NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: OOPS (below)
    > > > no NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: okay
    > > >
    > > > no NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM: okay
    > > > no NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1: okay
    > > > NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM: okay
    > > > NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1: untested, assume okay
    > >
    > >
    > > Honestly it smells like a devmapper bug, with the pertinent test case
    > > being some sort of behavior not normally generated by filesystem use
    > > (the most common use case for block devices).
    >
    > Except for the data point above:
    >
    > NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: OOPS (below)
    >
    > That's with devmapper totally out of the picture.

    Ahh, indeed.

    I think Andi did NUMA on x86-64?

    Jeff



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.024 / U:0.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site