Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement | From | Matthew Dobson <> | Date | Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:22:33 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:58, Paul Jackson wrote: > Matthew wrote: > > One of the cool thing about using sched_domains as your partitioning > > element is that in reality, tasks run on *CPUs*, not *domains*. > > Unfortunately, my manager has reminded me of an essential deliverable > that I have for another project, due in two weeks. I'm going to need > every one of those days. So I will have to take a two week sabbatical > from this design work. > > It might make sense to reconvene this work on a new thread, with a last > message on this monster thread inviting all interested parties to come > on over. I suspect a few folks will be happy to see this thread wind > down. > > I'd guess lse-tech (my preference) or ckrm-tech would be a suitable > forum for this new thread. > > Carry on.
Sounds good, Paul. I think the discussion on this thread was kind of winding down anyway. In two weeks I'll have some more work done on my code, particularly trying to get the cpusets/CKRM filesystem interface to play with my sched_domains code. We'll be able to digest all the the information, requirements, requests, etc. on this thread and start a fresh discussion on (or at least closer to) the same page.
-Matt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |