Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:15:46 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/3] lsm: add bsdjail module |
| |
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 08:11:24AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > That however requires a co-operator outside the chroot so doesn't seem > > to be a problem. I like the CLONE approach, its a lot cleaner. > > The attached patch (against -rc4-mm1) moves the responsibility for > filesystem containment entirely to userspace. The Documentation/bsdjail.txt > file reflects the new usage. It also incorporates Christoph's cleanups. > > I still need to see about generalizing the networking confinement. I > certainly like the concept (as I understand it at least) behind the new > vserver networking, but am not sure it can be done without patching.
Please remember that linux kernel work is not about "not needing patching". If a concept makes sense changing code is a good thing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |