[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Pentium M config option for 2.6
On Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:33:58 +0100, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > IOW, don't lie to the compiler and pretend P-M == P4
> > with that -march=pentium4.
> What do you recommend to use as march then? There is
> no pentiumm subarch support in gcc yet; I was convinced
> p4 was the closest match.

march=pentium3 is the closest safe choice, at least
until gcc implements P-M specific support.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.020 / U:18.924 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site