lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Lindent fixed to match reality
    From
    Date
    David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> writes:

    > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
    >> David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> writes:
    >>
    >> >> b) (no -bs) "sizeof(foo)" rather than "sizeof (foo)"
    >> >
    >> > I can't really see the logic in this, though I know a lot of people do
    >> > it. I try to stay consistent, thus I do:
    >> >
    >> > if ()
    >> > for ()
    >> > case ()
    >> > while ()
    >> > sizeof ()
    >> > typeof ()
    >> >
    >> > since they're all parts of the language, rather than
    >> > functions/macros or invocations of such.
    >>
    >> What I fail to see here is why that should make a difference regarding
    >> whitespace before the parens.
    >
    > All I'm trying to say, is that we should be consistent; most code
    > has:
    >
    > if (), for (), case (), while ()
    >
    > (and possibly sizeof foo, typeof foo)
    >
    > but
    >
    > sizeof(foo), typeof(foo)
    >
    > which is what I dislike (consistancy is good.)

    Well, those have function-like semantics in that they have a value,
    unlike an if statement. That could possibly explain the difference.
    I know perfectly well that sizeof is not a function, so don't bother
    explaining that.

    --
    Måns Rullgård
    mru@kth.se
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.047 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site