Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:03:45 +0100 | From | Kiko Piris <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.1] fbdev console: can't load vga=791 and yes vga=ask! |
| |
On 27/01/2004 at 23:37, James Simmons wrote:
> > In 2.6.1 I could use framebuffer through vesafb just with that parameter > > (vga=795, ie. 1280x10224 16M). > > This is very strange.
Well, back home again and I've been able to do some tests.
vesafb boots fine with 2.6.2-rc2, just I have to specify the parameter suggested by Zack Winkles : "vga=0795 video=vesafb:ywrap,pmipal,mtrr"
> Give it a try. If you have problems use my patch at > > http://phoenix.infradead.org/~jsimmons/fbdev.diff.gz > > > Althoug, I would prefer to use radeonfb instead of vesafb (radeonfb > > turns off my monitor and vesafb does not). > > > > Anyone with a Radeon 9200 does use radeonfb ? If yes, any special boot > > parameter? > > Try my newest patch. It has a updated radeon driver.
I tried the patch you mention here:
http://phoenix.infradead.org/~jsimmons/fbdev.diff.gz
against 2.6.1 (it does not apply to 2.6.2-rc2) and it does not work for me. I can only use 640x480. Any other resolution I try results in an usupported frequency for my monitor.
My graphics card is:
# lspci -s 01:00.1 -v 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5d44 (rev 01) Subsystem: Unknown device 18bc:0171 Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 32 Memory at d8000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Memory at e5010000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Please let me know if I can try anything else. I'll be very glad to test it (so I can use radeonfb, because as I said, I prefer it over vesafb).
TIA.
-- Kiko - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |