[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH, 2/4] readX_check() performance evaluation

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:33:33 -0800 (PST)
> Linus Torvalds <> wrote:
> > For example, if checking for an error involves actually reading a value
> > from a bridge register, then that implies some _serious_ amount of
> > serialization and external CPU stuff.
> Which is _extremly_ hard to do from an MCE handler ...

So don't do it in the MCE handler.

Just set a flag aka "may need checking", and let the check be done by the
actual "read_pcix_error()" code.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.095 / U:5.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site