Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:12:12 -0800 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | [SOLVED] Stale Filehandles was: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2 |
| |
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:47:16AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:55:04AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:31AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > I only had a few nfs clients doing light load, (kde home directories, and > > > such) and was able to reproduce stale nfs file handles just by running "find > > > > /dev/null" on the nfs share. > > > > > > Have you tried the -mm tree recently? 2.6.1-mm4 even has some new nfsd > > > patches in there (maybe you should wait until -mm5 though, there are a few > > > > Stale filehandles is the main problem right now, and I don't see how > > nfs_raname would be related (just that it was there while I was having > > trouble with the stale file handles...) > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.1/2.6.1-mm4/broken-out/nfsd-01-stale-filehandles-fixes.patch > > > > This one looks particularly interesting... > > > > I'm running 2.6.1-bk2-nfs-stale-file-handles on my nfsd server now, and so > far I haven't seen any stale filehandles. > > Can you guys patch stock 2.6.1 with the above and test also so we can get > more breadth in the testing results? >
Well, it's been running since friday with the same load that killed it in less than a day, so I'm happy.
And BTW, the code has been merged by Linus and is in 2.6.1-bk6.
Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |