[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] stronger ELF sanity checks v2

    > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:55:07AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
    > > Here's the second version of my patch to add better sanity checks for
    > > binfmt_elf
    > I assume this breaks Brian Raiter's tiny ELF executables[1]. Even
    > though these binaries are evil hacks that don't comply to standards
    > and serve no serious purpose, I'm not sure what the purpose of the
    > sanity checks is. Are there any risks associated with running
    > non-compliant ELF executables? (Now that I mention it, the

    You get vy ugly behaviour. If you compile executable with huge static
    data, it will compile okay, link okay, *launch okay* and die on
    segfault. That's wrong, it should have died on -ENOMEM during exec.

    When do you have a heart between your knees?
    [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.018 / U:14.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site