lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: modprobe failed: digest_null
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:01:31 -0800 "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org> wrote:

| On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:45 -0800 (PST) "David Rees" <drees@greenhydrant.com> wrote:
|
| | On Tue, January 13, 2004 at 3:03 pm, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| | >
| | > OK, maybe someone else has an answer then.
| | >
| | > The message:
| | > kernel: request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- digest_null. error = 256
| | > is from modutils and not from module-init-tools according to my
| | > source files.
| |
| | I'm getting similar messages from dmesg after upgrading to 2.6.1, too:
| |
| | request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- n. error = 256
| |
| | [drees@summit drees]$ /sbin/modprobe -V
| | module-init-tools version 3.0-pre5
| | [drees@summit drees]$
| |
| | Running on Fedora Core 1 compiled with gcc 3.3.2. Didn't see these with
| | 2.6.0.
|
| Yes, I see a couple of similar messages:
|
| request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- parport_lowlevel. error = -16
| request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- fb0. error = 256
|
| ...?

I don't think that it's related to IPsec since I'm not using that.

I'm looking at the changes in kernel/kmod.c for 2.6.1 to see if they
could cause it.

--
~Randy
MOTD: Always include version info.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.075 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site