Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:14:02 -0800 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance |
| |
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:57:36PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > P? lau , 10/01/2004 klokka 15:04, skreiv Guennadi Liakhovetski: > > Not change - keep (from 2.4). You see, the problem might be - somebody > > updates the NFS-server from 2.4 to 2.6 and then suddenly some clients fail > > to work with it. Seems a non-obvious fact, that after upgrading the server > > clients' configuration might have to be changed. At the very least this > > must be documented in Kconfig. > > Non-obvious????? You have to change modutils, you have to upgrade > nfs-utils, glibc, gcc... and that's only the beginning of the list. > > 2.6.x is a new kernel it differs from 2.4.x, which again differs from > 2.2.x, ... Get over it! There are workarounds for your problem, so use > them.
I have to admit, I haven't been following NFS on TCP very much. Is the code in the stock 2.4 and 2.6 kernels ready for production use? It seemed from what I read it was still experemental (and even marked as such in the config).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |