[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4.23 masquerading broken?
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:25:22PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:
> >For security reasons, I upgraded to 2.4.23 last night. Now, suddenly, IP
> >masquerading seems to be broken. When I use SNAT instead of
> >masquerading, everything works.
> >
> >Unfortunately, I think it's hard to reproduce the problem. Right after
> >booting .23 for the first time, everything seemed to be okay. The
> >problems started just an hour ago, after having the server running for
> >fifteen hours without any problems.
> >
> >Unfortunately there's not much more information I can provide. I can
> >attach my iptables/rule/route file and keep my machine running in case
> >anyone needs/wants more information. For now I'll just stick with SNAT.
> >It works good enough for me.

This seems to be the same as

I've committed the proposed fix (from #144) into patch-o-matic/pending.


> Patrick


- Harald Welte <>
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.127 / U:2.076 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site