Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 08 Sep 2003 10:20:00 -0400 | From | Haoqiang Zheng <> | Subject | Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy |
| |
How do you define "priority inversion" if the app is remote?
Alan Cox wrote:
>On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 15:25, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >>>in the best position to decide which process is more important. >>>That's why I proposed kernel based approach. >>> >>> >>Tasks can easily report their interactivity needs/nice value. >>X are already depend on clients not trying to screw each other, >>so thats okay. >> >> > >There is a slight problem with a kernel based approach too - the app may >be remote. > >Alan > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |