lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [2.4.23-pre3] Possible bug in fs/buffer.c
From
Date
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> On Llu, 2003-09-08 at 16:42, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> It's neither ugly, nor bogus. The only 100% reliable way to assign the
>> maximum value to an unsigned integer is to use -1.
>
> Its not 100% reliable either 8).

Could you please elaborate? Casting -1 to an unsigned type is guaranteed
to yield the maximum value for that type, at least since C89, but I think
even K&R C did get it right.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans