[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v12
    On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 05:36, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

    > > Well it would be nice if someone could find out how to do it, but I
    > > think that if we want X to be able to get 80% CPU when 2 other CPU hogs
    > > are running, you have to renice it.
    > OK. So you renice it ... then your two cpu jobs exit, and you kick off
    > xmms. Every time you waggle a window, X will steal the cpu back from
    > xmms, and it'll stall, surely? That's what seemed to happen before.
    > I don't see how you can fix anything by doing static priority alterations
    > (eg nice), because the workload changes.

    Not here with version 10 of Nick's patch, and X reniced to -10.
    I have not had chance to test v12, but will do tonight when I
    get home.


    Martin Schlemmer

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.018 / U:1.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site