Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:48:37 -0400 | From | Rob Radez <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4 - Watchdog patches |
| |
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:54:10PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Justin, > > > There is *no point* making these module parameters. There is no other > > watchdog that works in exactly the same way but using different io > > ports. If there was this still wouldnt be the sensible way to do it. > > Since I copied this part of Rob's watchdog-patch, I'll let Rob answer this one.
Mostly, it was because I didn't know that there weren't any other implementations of this watchdog that might use slightly different ports. If there aren't, then my apologies for unnecessary complication of the code.
Regards, Rob Radez - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |