[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Kernel includefile bug not fixed after a year :-(
    On Tue, Sep 30 2003, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
    > Jens Axboe wrote:
    > >On Tue, Sep 30 2003, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
    > >
    > >>Jens Axboe wrote:
    > >>
    > >>>I think I do.
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>>In order to use kernel interfaces you _need_ to include kernel include
    > >>>>files.
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>False. You need to include the glibc kernel headers.
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >>Then please tell me why PPPIOCNEWUNIT is only defined in linux/if_ppp.h
    > >>and not net/if_ppp.h which is still true for glibc-2.3.2. And please
    > >>don't tell me to ask the glibc folks. There are inconsistencies between
    > >>kernel headers and userland headers which force the inclusion of kernel
    > >>headers in userland applications.
    > >
    > >
    > >I will tell you to talk to the glibc folks, because that's where your
    > >problem is.
    > >
    > I don't think so. If ioctls are introduced in the kernel the kernel
    > people should propagate these to the glibc people. I don't think it is
    > the task of userland developers.

    It's not solely their responsibility, I agree. Just see my mail to
    davem. Did you tell the glibc folks about the missing ioctls?

    > But then this is my point of view and I don't think it necessary to
    > discuss this further.

    Agree. It's long been established that kernel headers aren't always
    suitable for user space inclusion, this discussion doesn't change that

    Jens Axboe

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.024 / U:11.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site