lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why Sysrq+k does not offer a trusted path
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 08:53:59AM +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote:
> Thus it is a more secure way to offer a real SAK.
>
> Or am I missing a very important point?

Scanning through the file descriptor tables of processes does not catch
every opened file out there. For trivial example consider attaching an
open file to SCM_RIGHTS datagram and sending it to yourself. Then close
the original descriptor. Later you will be able to receive the datagram
and get your opened file back.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.051 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site