lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.0-test6
    On Sun, 28 September 2003 21:31:50 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:16:22PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
    > > How about a check_headers target that roughly works like this:
    > >
    > > for (all header files in include/linux and include/asm) {
    > > echo "#include <$HEADER>" > header.c
    > > make header.o
    > > rm header.c header.o
    > > }
    >
    > That should do it. Can you also integrate the check Linus mentioned,
    > to make sure no declarations are present.

    If it's simple enough, you'll have it tomorrow. Linus' check might
    take a bit longer, I'm not sure yet how to define an empty object
    file. Is it enough if objdump -tT only shows sections?

    > I would name the target: headercheck:
    > to be consistent with the other targets.

    ok.

    > It should be fine having it as a separate target, then we can ask
    > John Cherry to include it in his nightly builds.

    That would be nice, yes.

    Jörn

    --
    Measure. Don't tune for speed until you've measured, and even then
    don't unless one part of the code overwhelms the rest.
    -- Rob Pike
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:2.566 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site