Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:48:58 +1200 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3 |
| |
Could you also give me some clear direction on where you want me to put my 2.4 port. Should it go in kernel/power, or somewhere else? (I'm assuming you don't want 3 versions of swsusp?!). I'd like to put it in the right place when I start populating swsusp25.bkbits.net, so you're not pulling changesets later that only move the code around (I know bk reduces the cost, but...).
Regards,
Nigel
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 05:40, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On 28 Sep 2003 pavel@ucw.cz wrote: > > > > This should not be warring patch. Pat > > already has variant in his tree, > > feel free to pull from him - but it > > would be nice to have working swsusp > > in -test6. --p > > Ok. In that case, can we remove the '#if 0' blocks entirely, or at least > add a big comment on why they are there but disabled? > > I'd also like to have some kind of readme or similar on the different > suspend/resume issues, and why we have two different approaches. Hmm? > > Linus > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Nigel Cunningham 495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand
You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. -- Romans 5:6, NIV.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |