[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Minimizing the Kernel
    Well for starters dont use gcc 3 or above.. code size has increased 
    dramatically with thoose versions. sure they give you more optimization , but
    if your looking for a small kernel use anything below 3..

    Matt H.

    On Wednesday 24 September 2003 09:32 am, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
    > I want to created the smallest, fastest kernel that supports all the
    > necessary features of a given system.
    > Obviously, the answer is very system dependent, requiring a keen
    > knowledge of the relationships between hardware and Linux components.
    > Unless I'm missing something (always a possibility), the kernel
    > configurations do not provide a clear idea of component size. In other
    > words, if I include "burfulgunk port support" in my kernel build, I'd
    > like to have a rough idea of the component's size. I might not need to
    > support the "burfulgunk", especially if it's a large component (for,
    > say, a legacy port.)
    > I'm well aware that code sizes differ between platforms; I'm looking for
    > general information, as a guideline to generating a small kernel.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.021 / U:30.372 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site