lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRE: [PATCH 2.6.x] additional kernel event notifications
    Date
    From
    Hi,

    "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
    > Have you considered interfacing vtune userspace
    > to oprofilefs and enhancing oprofilefs to meet
    > vtune requirements, thus removing the need for
    > the vtune kernel module, and its device node
    > and ioctl interface?

    We have considered the option of using Oprofile's mechanisms for VTune,
    but Oprofile and VTune do different things in different ways. For
    example,
    both tools capture performance data, but Oprofile was designed with
    aggregation in mind whereas VTune was designed to collect all the data
    and then post-process it.

    We are open to putting the VTune driver into the kernel source tree.
    However, is consolidation of the performance tools a requirement for
    getting the four additional event notifications into the kernel?

    -juan
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean