[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [CHECKER] 32 Memory Leaks on Error Paths

Timothy Miller wrote:

>>> 276: /* OK, it's not open. Create cache info for it */
>>> START -->
>>> 277: mtdblk = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mtdblk_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> 278: if (!mtdblks)
>>> END -->
>>> 279: return -ENOMEM;
>> Invalid. This is quite an obvious false positive, at least if your
>> algorithm checks for possible value ranges.
> Wait... one is "mtdblk", and the other is "mtdblks". One has an extra
> 's' on it. Unless there is some kind of aliasing going on, they would
> appear to be different variables. Naturally, I didn't check the
> original code, so I could be full of it. :)

Yes its a bug from glancing at the source code.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.080 / U:2.900 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site