[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model]
On Fri Sep 12, 2003 at 04:58:03PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
> David Schwartz wrote:
> > However, some people seem to be arguing that the GPL_ONLY symbols
> > are in
> >fact a license enforcement technique. If that's true, then when they
> >distribute their code, they are putting additional restrictions not in the
> >GPL on it. That is a GPL violation.
> Agreed. GPL_ONLY is not a license restriction. It is a technical issue.

I'll go even farther, and say that one might call the GPL_ONLY
symbols an "effective technological measure" that "effectively
controls access to a work" and "effectively protects a right of a
copyright owner ... in the ordinary course of its operation....".
Bypassing GPL_ONLY symbols, as recently advocated by David
Schwartz and Andre Hedrick, could be considered circumvention of
an effective technological measure. Remember Dmitry Sklyarov,


Erik B. Andersen
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.206 / U:42.348 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site