Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 04:08:46 -0500 | From | Matt Mackall <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] netpoll api |
| |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:39:35PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > > Hmmm, linux/irq.h seemed pretty generic. Maybe those other, silly > > arches can mend their ways? > > linux/irq.h: > > /* > * Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently > * no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held > * within this file. > * > * Thanks. --rmk > */ > > Generic? Nice try :)
But, uh, all my comments show up in a Greek font. Or something..
(the real problem is that I jumped straight to the structure in LXR)
> > Ok, looks like m68k, s390, and sparcx are the only ones not using > > irq_desc, and only s390 seems to be far from the irq_desc model. Or I > > could be quite mistaken. > > irq_desc will probably die in 2.7, replaced with some helper macros. Its > not a neat fit for many arches (ppc64 included).
Well I'll come up with something for x86 tomorrow and when helper macros materialize, I'll use them.
-- Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : of or relating to the moon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |