[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fix up power managment in 2.6

> > He just thinks he can fix his code, and I want that code to be
> > reverted, reviewed, tested, and than merged back. There's no way
> > current mess can be fixed in reasonable time.
> Please don't - that means undoing all the work I've put in to make
> ARM work again, and I don't have time to play silly games like this.

Okay, so Patrick broke ARM and you fixed it. But he also broke i386 and
x86-64; and it is not at all clear that his "newer" version is better
than the old one. [Really, what's the advantage? AFAICS it is more
complicated and less flexible, putting "suspend" method to bus as
oppossed to device].

I guess I could survive dm changes going in, but breaking both driver
model, sleep support and all the drivers at same time is a bit too

When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.075 / U:3.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site