[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.4.22pre8 hangs too (Re: 2.4.21-jam1, aic7xxx-6.2.36: solid hangs)
    On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:55:02PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
    > Ok, the kernel compiled with gcc version 3.2.1 20021207 (Red Hat Linux 8.0
    > 3.2.1-2) has now been up for more than a week. It seems stable, but I'm not
    > sure yet.
    > Which brings me to the question: which gcc version is considered most stable
    > for compiling 2.4.x these days?
    > This seems to suggest 2.96-85 would be more stable than gcc-3.2.1-2. Is this
    > the case?

    2.95.3 and the (unofficial) 2.96 are the best compilers for 2.4 .

    In most cases 3.2.1 will give you a working kernel, but if you need
    maximum stablity don't use gcc 3.x for compiling kernel 2.4 .



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.021 / U:36.816 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site