Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 Aug 2003 13:30:01 -0400 | From | Chip Salzenberg <> | Subject | NULL. Again. (was Re: [PATCH] 2.4.22pre10: {,un}likely_p()) |
| |
According to Jamie Lokier: > Not just K&R. These are different because of varargs: > printf ("%p", NULL); > printf ("%p", 0);
*SIGH* I thought incorrect folk wisdom about NULL and zero and pointer conversions had long since died out. More fool I. Please, *please*, _no_one_else_ argue about NULL/zero/false etc. until after reading this:
===[[ http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/s5.html ]]===
I thank you, and linux users everywhere thank you. -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@pobox.com> "I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence, but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |