[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] RCU: Reduce size of rcu_head 1 of 2
In message <> you write:
> On Sad, 2003-08-02 at 02:49, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Sure. But it's not neccessary. The replacement is cleaner and
> > smaller, sure, but it's not worth changing once 2.6 is out. In 2.7,
> > sure.
> >
> > I'm happy to accept "no" from Andrew, but not happy to accept "we'll
> > just change the API midway through 2.6".
> Please distinguish API from ABI. There is no ABI, there is no need for
> an ABI.

You are confused, but it seems you are not alone. I don't understand
where this talk of ABI came from.

There are two patches. Both reduce the size of the "struct rcu_head".
One simply changes the struct rcu_head from a double linked list to a
single linked list. The other eliminates the "void *data" arg, and
changes the prototype of the call_rcu() function to take a pointer to
the struct rcu_head, rather than a user-defined data ptr.

It is the latter that I am concerned about changing mid-stable-series.

Hope that clarifies,
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.076 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site