[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6: More about interactivity
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 17:20, Szonyi Calin wrote:

> Some comments:
> Renicing X at -20 is silly. It is normal that xmms skips when
> X is reniced because X gets the cpu time not xmms.

I didn't say XMMS skips when X is reniced at -20 :-)
It's Juk the one that skips and, as one LKLM reader said, it has to do
with the fact that aRTS had less priority than X.

> Also a normal user doesn't have access to nice values below
> zero, so the scheduler should work for normal systems not
> for those in which process foo is reniced at -bar priority.

Can't follow you reasoning. I think the scheduler should work for any
priority, either negative (the most) or possitive (the least). In fact,
some kernel threads are reniced negatively since they need full

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.074 / U:6.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site