lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Filesystem Tests
Diego Calleja García wrote:

>El Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:08:50 -0700 Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> escribió:
>
>
>
>>But with servers, the larger your filesystem, the longer it will take to
>>fsck. And that is bad for uptime. Period.
>>
>>
>
>Sure. But Han's "don't benchmark ext2 because it's not an option" isn't
>a valid stament, at least to me.
>
>I'm not saying ext2 is the best fs on earth, but i *really* think
>it's a real option, and as such, it must be benchmarked.
>
>
>
>
Actually, I think it would be nice if Grant benchmarked it because it
shows the overhead of ext3's journaling, but it should be noted that it
is not a valid option for most servers.

--
Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.082 / U:1.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site