Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Bugzilla bug # 322 - double logical operator drivers/char/sx.c | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Wed, 06 Aug 2003 23:12:38 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 21:26:30 EDT, Jeff Sipek said:
> > Can you really DO (x < y > z) and have it work as an anded pair of > > comparisons? Maybe this is an addition to C that I am not aware of. > > > > I would expect (x < y > z) to be equivalent to ((x < y) > z). > > Ah, very true. I wonder what the author intended. Also, since the 'z' is 0 in > all the cases, the statement "(i < TIMEOUT) > 0" can be reduced to "i < > TIMEOUT".
Of course, if the author intended (x<y) && (x > 0), you can't reduce it if x is at all possibly negative.... [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |