[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <> writes:

Andrew> Martin Konold <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> when using 2.6.0.test1 on a high end laptop (P-IV 2.2 GHz, 1GB RAM)
>> I notice very significant slowdown in interactive usage compared to
>> 2.4.21.
>> The difference is most easily seen when switching folders in
>> kmail. While 2.4.21 is instantaneous 2.6.0.test1 shows the clock
>> for about 2-3 seconds.

I see the same problem, and I'm using XFS. Booting with
elevator=deadline fixed it for me. The anticipatory scheduler hurts
if you have a disc optimised for low power consumption, not speed.

Dr Peter Chubb peterc AT
You are lost in a maze of BitKeeper repositories, all slightly different.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.082 / U:2.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site