[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] revert to static = {0}
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>If it's const, it shouldn't be linked into anything at all... right?
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>Sorry, Jeff, I don't get your point.
> I suspect this assumes const values will get constant folded, which I'm
> not sure is the case, though it certainly sounds legal and worthwhile
> for a compiler to do when reasonable (i.e. for small structures and/or
> extractions of small fields of const structures).

Correct. In fact, some Linux kernel code _assumes_ the compiler will
fold constants...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.087 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site