lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two
> [szepe@pinerecords.com]
>
> > [poup@poupinou.org]
> >
> > > o only enable cpufreq options if power management is selected
> > > o don't put cpufreq options in a separate submenu
> >
> > Yes, but what I do not understand is why cpufreq need power management.
>
> Because it is a power management option. :)
>
> CONFIG_PM is a dummy option, it does not link any code into the kernel
> by itself.

Ooops, I ain't right. :)

There actually seems to be code that depends on CONFIG_PM,
particularly so on arches other that x86, so the 'depends
on PM' clause for cpufreq is indeed bogus.

Thanks for pointing this out, I'll post a fixed patch.

--
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.064 / U:1.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site