Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:52:27 -0400 | From | Paul Mundt <> | Subject | Re: lk maintainers |
| |
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:36:03PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > This document is mailed to lkml regularly and will be modified > whenever new victim wishes to be listed in it or someone can > no longer devote his time to maintainer work. > Isn't this exactly what MAINTAINERS is for? What is the point of having this lk-maintainers list if MAINTAINERS is supposed to be authoritative?
It seems like this adds more confusion then anything else, since now it's not obvious what should be considered the defacto standard maintainer list.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |